Relationship Quiz Completion Patterns: Live Lustlore Data

What the current quiz data shows

Dataset snapshot: July 8, 2026 at 11:28 AM. Published July 6, 2026.

How to read these distributions without overclaiming

This page aggregates real completions, but it does not pretend those completions are neutral. A person who lands on an attachment quiz is already telling you something by arriving. They are not a random adult pulled off the street. They are someone whose dating life, breakup, sexual connection, or ghosting experience has become psychologically legible enough to seek a label for it. That makes the dataset unusually rich as a behavioral snapshot of distress, confusion, and self-observation. It also means the numbers should never be flattened into claims like “this is the most common type of person.” The page is describing a live audience under activation.

The sample-size framing is there for the same reason. If a quiz has nine completions, the most honest sentence is not “47% of people are X.” The honest sentence is that early respondents are clustering in one place, and that the shape may change quickly as more people arrive. Even when a sample is larger, percentages stay within a quiz. A 38% anxious result on one instrument and a 34% slow-burner result on another cannot be combined into a single prevalence claim because the quizzes are measuring different constructs. One is about attachment organization. Another is about the conditions under which intimacy becomes possible in the body.

That distinction is exactly what makes the dataset useful. Relationship problems do not show up on one axis. People do not only have an attachment pattern. They also have a way of responding to erotic closeness, a tolerance or intolerance for ambiguity, a defensive position toward dependence, and an interpretation of retreat when someone disappears. Reading the quizzes side by side makes those layers visible without pretending they are interchangeable.

Live result distributions by quiz

The tables below are generated from the live aggregate in the quiz_completions table. Each block shows the total sample size for that quiz, the honesty tier used on this page, and the within-quiz percentage breakdown by result. If a quiz has no data yet, it says so directly. If the database is temporarily unavailable, the section withholds substitute numbers rather than turning an outage into a fake zero.

What repeats across the attachment, intimacy, and ambiguity quizzes

The strongest cross-quiz pattern is not a single percentage. It is the repeated appearance of defenses organized around closeness. When attachment-style data clusters around anxious, avoidant, or fearful positions, that is one layer of the story: how a person interprets distance, need, and threat. When intimacy-style data clusters around slow-burner, guardian, seeker, or voltage positions, that adds a second layer: what happens once attraction moves from idea to bodily exposure. Those two layers are not redundant. They explain different stages of the same relational problem.

On the Attachment Style Quiz, Anxious Attachment currently leads at 46.7% (n=15). On the Intimacy Style Quiz, the current lead is held back until the live query is available. When those leads point in different directions, that does not mean the reader is inconsistent. It usually means one system is organizing for emotional safety while another is organizing for erotic safety. A person can want reassurance and still freeze when tenderness makes them too visible.

The ambiguity-heavy quizzes add another signal. On the Situationship Quiz, Gray Zone currently leads at 66.7% (n=3). On the ghosting diagnostic, Competing Options currently leads at 100% (n=1). These results are less about trait and more about meaning-making under uncertainty. They show what people most need explained when someone goes silent, refuses definition, or alternates warmth with distance.

Codependency and composite-pattern data deepen that picture even further. On the Codependency Quiz, the current pattern will populate here from the live aggregate. On the Name My Pattern Quiz, the leading attachment-plus-intimacy combination will populate here from the live aggregate. Those instruments matter because they show how often relationship distress is not just fear of loss or fear of engulfment on its own, but a compound strategy: pursue and protect, merge and retreat, overfunction and resent, want closeness and brace against being known.

Methodology, limitations, and how to cite this page

The underlying method is intentionally simple. Each completed quiz writes one row to the quiz_completions table with a quiz_slug, a result_key, and a timestamp. This page groups those rows by quiz_slug and result_key, counts them, and calculates each result’s share within that quiz. No raw email addresses are shown. No individual records are exposed. The page is publishing only aggregated counts and percentages.

The limitation is just as simple: self-selection. People come here because something in their relational life already hurts, confuses, grips, or activates them. That means the data is highly relevant to readers, clinicians, and writers trying to understand current relationship pain points online. It also means the distribution says more about who seeks reflection than about the whole public. That is not a flaw in the page. It is the condition that makes the page psychologically interesting in the first place.

If you cite this page, cite the quiz name, the result label, the sample size shown beside that quiz, and the snapshot date near the top of the article. The percentages update as new completions arrive. A sentence like “On Lustlore’s Attachment Style Quiz, anxious attachment led with 41% of 312 completions as of July 6, 2026” is reproducible and honest. A sentence like “most people are anxious attached” would not be.